Updates

Update – 27th March 2014

We have agreed with the BBC an amendment to the Review’s terms of reference in order to allow the BBC to commence an independent assessment of its child protection and whistleblowing policies now. The intention was that the Review’s work into whether the BBC’s current child protection and whistleblowing processes were fit for purpose would commence once the main report had been delivered. However in light of the changes in the Review’s timetable, including the recent delay to the report’s publication at the request of the Lancashire Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (North West), the BBC have decided that they wish to undertake an independent assessment of their processes now rather than waiting until later in the year. More information about the BBC’s Review can be found here.

The Review’s terms of reference will now be changed as follows:

Dame Janet Smith will:

  1. receive evidence from those people who allege inappropriate sexual conduct by Jimmy Savile in connection with his work with the BBC, and from others who claim to have raised concerns about Jimmy Savile’s activities (whether formally or informally) within the BBC; (PART 1)
  2. investigate the extent to which BBC personnel were or ought to have been aware of inappropriate sexual conduct by Jimmy Savile in connection with his work with the BBC, and consider whether the culture and practices within the BBC during the years of Jimmy Savile’s employment enabled inappropriate sexual conduct to continue unchecked; (PART 2)
  3. in the light of findings of fact in respect of the above, consider whether the BBC’s current child protection and whistle blowing policies are fit for purpose and identify the lessons to be learned from the evidence uncovered by the Review; (PART 3)
  4. as necessary, take account of the findings of Dame Linda Dobbs in her investigation into the activities of Stuart Hall.

Update – 21st January 2014

The Review recently received a request from Lancashire Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (North West) to postpone delivery of its Report until the criminal proceedings against Stuart Hall have concluded in mid-2014.

The Review understands that this request arises from the possibility that it might be suggested that the Report could adversely affect the fairness of Mr Hall’s trial.

Dame Janet Smith and Dame Linda Dobbs appreciate the wish of many (including the victims) that the Report be delivered as quickly as possible. They have, however, considered the request and concluded that, in the interests of justice, delivery of the Report should be delayed. The BBC has been informed of, and agrees with, the Review’s decision.

The Review will update its website when a more precise estimated delivery date is known.

Update – 20th January 2014

The Review has noted recent media comment about the supposed findings in its Report. It is the Review’s practice not to comment on media coverage. However, it is necessary to state that the information reported does not come from the Review and that it is speculative and unreliable.

While the Review fully understands the wish to know what happened at the BBC during the Savile years, the Review is not prepared to give any indication of its findings in advance of the publication of its Report.

Update – 29th November 2013

The Review has been in contact with more than 720 people and continues to be grateful to the public for their support. In connection with the investigation into Jimmy Savile, the Review has had over 340 telephone conversations with witnesses (all of which have been noted) and approximately 140 witness interviews have taken place. In addition, in relation to the investigation into Stuart Hall, the Review has had over 102 noted telephone conversations with witnesses and a further 29 witness interviews have taken place.

Witness interviews are continuing and, as a result, the Review will not be in a position to finalise its report before the end of January 2014.

Update – 4th June 2013
The Dame Janet Smith Review’s terms of reference have now been amended to include an investigation into the conduct of Stuart Hall in connection with his work for the BBC.  Please see the terms of reference and explanatory note for more detail on the scope of the Stuart Hall investigation (Terms of reference – Stuart Hall).  The opportunity has also been taken to amend the terms of reference for the Savile investigation slightly both to reflect the approach that the investigation has been taking since it began and to ensure consistency with the terms of reference of the Stuart Hall investigation (Terms of reference – Jimmy Savile).  As Dame Janet Smith has a potential conflict of interest in relation to Stuart Hall as a result of the fact that she knows personally an individual who was a member of senior management in BBC North West at the relevant time, the Stuart Hall investigation is therefore being chaired by Dame Linda Dobbs DBE.

In connection with investigating Jimmy Savile, the Dame Janet Smith Review has been in contact with approximately 600 people and has had over 310 telephone conversations with witnesses, all of which have been noted.  120 witness interviews have now taken place and a number of these interviews have been with individuals who were subject to inappropriate sexual conduct by Savile.  Witness interviews are continuing.

However, the Savile investigation is unable to progress certain aspects of its work as a consequence of a need to wait, at the request of the police, before it approaches a number of potential interviewees whose evidence may be relevant to on-going criminal investigations.  It is unclear whether these criminal investigations will lead to prosecutions but, if prosecutions do take place, Dame Janet Smith may need to wait a considerable time before she can approach these potential interviewees.

As a result both of the addition of Stuart Hall to the Dame Janet Smith Review’s terms of reference and the matters referred to above, the timeframe for the production of reports is being extended.  Current revised expectations are that a report will be completed towards the end of 2013 and that a second report, which will consider whether the BBC’s current child protection and whistle blowing policies are fit for purpose, will be produced as early as possible in 2014.  The question whether the current inability to approach certain witnesses referred to above in relation to the Savile investigation will result in  the production of an interim (as opposed to a final) report into Jimmy Savile  will be kept under consideration.

Update – 21 March 2013

The Review has been in contact with approximately 450 people and has had over 275 telephone conversations with witnesses, all of which have been noted. To date, in-person witness interviews have taken place with 80 witnesses, a number of whom were subject to inappropriate sexual conduct by Jimmy Savile. Further witness interviews will take place throughout April and May.

Celia Brackenridge has been appointed as Child Protection Expert to the Review. Celia has been a Professorial Research Fellow at Brunel University London since 2005 and, in 2012, was awarded the OBE in the Queen’s New Year’s Honours.

Update – 18 February 2013

The Review has been contacted by just over 425 people and has made contact with almost 400 of these people so far. The Review has had approximately 250 telephone conversations with witnesses, each of which has been noted. There have been in the region of 60 face to face witness interviews and further in-person interviews are scheduled over the next few weeks.

The Review is close to finalising the appointment of a Child Protection Expert. It continues to liaise with the BBC in relation to the provision of copies of programmes and relevant documentation.

The Review team would like to thank all of the witnesses who have given up their time to assist with this important task.

Update – 11 January 2013

The Review has been contacted by more than 355 people and has made contact with over 330 of them to date. The Review has had over 150 telephone conversations with witnesses, all of which have been noted. In-person witness interviews have taken place with 15 witnesses. Witness interviews are continuing.

The Review Team has made site visits to the Shepherds Bush Empire Theatre (which was formerly owned by the BBC) and BBC Television Centre. A number of documents have also been obtained from the BBC’s Written Archives.

Update – 28 December 2012


The Review has been contacted by more than 330 people and has made contact with almost 300 of them to date. The Review has taken just over 125 initial submissions. Formal witness interviews are now under way and numerous interviews have been scheduled for January 2013.

Update – 11 December 2012

The Review would like to hear from anyone with information about the whereabouts of Jimmy Savile’s flats in London in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. If you have any information which may be of assistance, please contact the Review.

We have been corresponding with more than 250 people and have taken 60 initial submissions. Formal witness interviews have commenced, including with people who allege inappropriate sexual conduct by Jimmy Savile. Further witness interviews are scheduled for this week.

The Review has continued to receive helpful information from individuals, including current and former BBC employees.

Update: 5 December 2012

There has been a very positive response to the Review’s appeal for witnesses. The Review has been contacted by over 290 individuals, many of whom are either current or former BBC employees. We would like to pass on our thanks to all those who have contacted us. We have made contact with just over 220 of these people to date and formal interviews with witnesses commenced earlier this week.

The Review has been liaising with NAPAC, The Lucy Faithfull Foundation and the NSPCC in relation to the provision of support for victims. The BBC is also assisting the Review with the provision of relevant documentation.

The Review continues to liaise closely with the police officers involved in Operation Yewtree.

Further updates will be published here in due course.